With the balance of power shifting in favor of western countries
in the last few decades, the ideal of a liberal democracy has gained popularity.
Every country in the world aspires to achieve this system based on the
principles of equity, liberty, justice and representation. While many states
are self-proclaimed democracies, it can be argued that in reality these systems
are at best polyarchies. In fact the characteristics of these polyarchies may
prevent the achievement of democracy.
An essential principle of democracies is the concept of
equal representation which means that the views of each and every individual
are reflected in the political process. While countries such as the USA seem to
be illustrative of this concept with the ‘one man one vote’ policy, the
realities that underlie electoral systems are considerably more complex. There
are, for example, socio economic constraints to representation. Evidence suggests
that the outcome of the US elections tends to favor middle class interests
rather than lower class interests because members of the lower class have
considerably less political participation due to economic and cultural differences.
Moreover,certain groups in the society are systematically excluded from the democratic process. For example, more
than four million U.S. citizens residing in the U.S. territories such as Puerto
Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands) are excluded from participating in the
election of any voting-member of Congress, which are the political bodies that
hold ultimate sovereignty over them.
Moreover, polyarchies tend to concentrate power in to the
hands of the ruling elite and bar members of other classes from gaining power.
Therefore, it is difficult to attain the democratic ideal as
the workings of the polyarchic governments prevent countries from doing so.
1 comment:
I agree with Rija's point of view. Although , USA is considered as one of the best examples of a liberal democracy and the country itself promotes a 'world of liberal democracies', it can be roughly classified as a western polyarchy. There is a very thin line between a polyarchy and a democracy. I believe that as USA does not fulfil the criteria of a democracy fully it would be better to call it a polyarchy. In addition to the exclusion of a certain percentage of USA's population in the election process as Rija has mentioned, it is also true that the distribution of wealth in the USA is highly concentrated and there is a great degree of income inequality.
Post a Comment