The economic structure of a nation is the chief determinant
of the other elements of its superstructure. The pervasive influence of the economic
subsystem extends to state apparatuses such as the religion, media and most
importantly the political system. In fact, economic ideology is an essential feature
of a party’s political manifesto. It is only natural then that many economic
systems have evolved over the years to meet the needs of the political system
and vice versa.
Two of the most important economic ideologies that have
influenced political organization over the ages are capitalism and socialism.
Even though the capitalist system is the economic system that is currently in
practice in most of the countries of the world, it has some obvious flaws. The primary
criticism of capitalism is that it leads to the concentration of wealth in the
hands of a few select elite who then use their power to exploit the
economically subservient majority. The capitalist system with its inherent
drive for profit stops at nothing to maximize that outcome.
The flaws of capitalism may lead some to believe that a
system of equitable wealth sharing is a viable way in which exploitation can be
countered, but experience has proved otherwise. The failure of socialism validates
this claim. Socialism is based on the
idea of the collective ownership of resources such that all resources are used
for the mutual benefit of a country’s citizens. The socialist system was criticized
on the grounds that it took away individual ownership and with that individual
liberty as well as the drive for efficiency.
So what then is a
viable economic system? A solution might be a mix of capitalist and socialist
ideas with essential industries in the control of the government while other
institutions under private ownership, maximizing both equity and efficiency.
1 comment:
I agree with your view that the solution to having a viable economic system is a mix of capitalist and socialist ideas. However, one can argue that no pure system of capitalism or socialisn has occured truly. There have always been some elements of each present in a system. I believe the fault lies in the deterministic view that a country can follow only one or the other and cannot, as you said, have a mix of both.
Post a Comment