Monday, March 2, 2015

Session 10: Political executives and the State

Usually considering both the words with the same meaning, till the last couple of months I personally never even intervened and thought of state and government as two different words. Later I came to know that these two words have meanings that are miles apart.Where the government is a term that is used for the governing party or the people that have became a part of the assemblies via the electoral process. The term state refers to the bureaucracy that is maintaining and running the smooth operations of the country and in theory is least bothered about which government is ruling or is in power.

In Heywood’s reading regarding Political executives it was mentioned that it is the responsibility of the Government (assemblies) to make the laws according to their political and ideological priorities of their party; the duty of the state and civil servants is to bring those policies into action and make sure that they are implemented accurately without providing any sort of political favor or biases to any particular political party.

Comparing this scenario with the current condition in my country will give almost a completely different picture. As far as the power game is concerned, politicians hold the supreme authority to control and even implement things that are in their favor. A strong web of relationships is broadened from the prime minister to the clerks, each supporting and advancing the interest of his senior. Political affiliations are so strong that many of the relatives of the politicians in power are given high posts regardless of their qualifications. Things have gone so far that vacancies of civil offices are being sold out in a proper bidding process. Starting from a low amount for a lower post and going in millions for a higher post.

According to theory everything works out extremely well and there exists no mutual interdependence between state and the government but the problem is that it’s just a theory and things work differently on practical grounds. The question to be raised is that whether this so called affiliation and dichotomy of State and government will keep on existing or will there be any political executives who will draw the think line of differentiation between both of them.  


2 comments:

Unknown said...

The State and Govt. are surely two different things and the way you described them, I personally appreciate that. Though in Pak, everything is working oppositely to the theories and things must be altered and tackled quickly with greater care and attention.

Ilm-e-Rektha said...

I agree with your point of view, It is problem of third World countries because Our Politicians are untrained,Illiterate and unaware about managing Skills they think Pakistan as Inheritance their fathers basically they are belonging to special class of capitalists, Feudal Lords and elites therefore, They have own interests. Our country is passing through state of Anarchy and Revolution in which conflict between two classes as Marx said and It will result in good and be Optimistic!!