The reading, that this session focuses on,
states at one instance that “as society becomes more complex and fragmented,
people may increasingly look to the personal vision of individual leaders to
give coherence and meaning to the world in which they live”. In the light of
this quote, I would like to discuss the potential that leaders as individual
personalities hold in the eyes of the governed. According to the fundamental
concept of leadership, it can either be understood as a collective term that
teems with several oligarchic parties and individuals that exert their influence
over the running of a State; or as one individual who solely embodies the
silhouette of a leader, possessing the charisma and intellect needed to evoke
devotion and submission by the entire nation. The world has seen several
examples of such leaders in historical scriptures or otherwise, among which Bhutto
dominates the East and Hitler prevails in the West, just as Aristotle said “men
are marked out from the moment of birth to rule or be ruled”. Thus, the idea
that the Executive has unquestioned authority over matters such as Law and
Order, policy making, and others of equal significance, is factually correct
but ideologically incomplete since the ruled are to their very basic nature ‘humans’
and what never fails to sway them are the flourishes of ethos and pathos in
powerful words spoken by a leader. Hence building up on the herd instinct of
the masses, a carefully crafted legislation or strictly monitored law and order
can be equally defeated by the charm and charisma of a leader who can rely on
his instincts as much as his intellect to lead a nation.
1 comment:
Although a charismatic leader does influence and command his/her followers to a large extent, i do not think it is realistic to assume that the power of a leader can supercede the power of the state.Sure history has had examples of powerful leaders like nelson mandela who were able to bring great change,but it can be said that those personalities are hard to come by. Propaganda and exercise of authority by powerful state actors can undermine and restrict the authority of the leader such as the case with Bhutto's hanging
.
Post a Comment