Legitimacy has always remained an essential question in
Pakistan even after passing the 67 years of independence. Each of the crises
consists of almost the same characteristics and events, as a product of
dictatorship. If we look the Pakistan history it is clearly evident that in
most of times these crises end up in a military coup which is considered as
rightful and sanctioned as legitimize by the superior courts, through the
doctrine of necessity. Moreover, the abrogation of the constitution is treated
as legal along with the dictatorial law and constitution. – This structure of
military dictatorship is established on some key pillars without which their authoritarian
rule loses its credibility. Who are these key players in this legitimization
process?
The right to rule over almost 200 million people nation is
somehow given by the judges as well as the top judges who have the authority to
draft the ‘legal’ constitutional frameworks and the emergency declarations that
make it lawful for the dictators to rule. The politicians pave a path for this
legitimizing this illegitimate rule. – How do they work? The divisions are
made; some new parties are formed or strengthen the existing with weak/corrupt
leaders, the parliamentarians are corrupted by these dictators indirectly so
that in the end they could come and become a champion of democracy putting the
nation back to the stable democratic way.
In almost every military establishment, the country faced
economic growth and political stability. – In this, one could question that why
was it usually only in the military coup and not in other parties government?
The economy is growing and there’s an atmosphere of nation building along with
socio – economic progress. – Where does this flow of funds and grants come
from? Are not the foreign powers are at stage in legitimizing their rule?
No comments:
Post a Comment