In today’s capitalist society,
economics and politics are synonymous to each other- one cannot progress without
the other. If we look back to the 20th century, we see that
classical realists strayed from this view and believed that only maximizing a
state’s military power can help the state ensure its survival and security
rather than its economic well-being. With the passage of time, in the international
relations arena, the views regarding the economic and political welfare of a
state started evolving as well.
Classical realists rely greatly on
the rationality and selfishness of humans and their thirst for power, neo-realism
talks about latent power-the economy and the population. Neo-realists believed
that in order to maximize security and military power, a state needs to focus
on its economic structure as well because the bigger the economy, the budget
allocated for military development will also be bigger. Similarly, as the world
moved towards liberalism and free markets, the emphasis on the betterment of a
state’s economy also increased greatly. Liberalists believed that through
complex interdependence and trans-nationalism, the world’s political order will
be stable and peace can be achieved. As the linkages between states increase,
they become so dependent on each other that any broken law or rule will have
dire consequences on the state’s economy.
The importance given to the
economic prosperity of a state can also be explained through the Marxist
critique of capitalism. Marxists believe that the capitalist society uses the
economy as a base and translate their economic power into political power which
they then use to further exploit the proletariat and make sure that their power
remains unimpaired.
Where economics is concerned with studying
and influencing the economy, politics is the theory of influencing people by
exercising power. Time and time again, theorists have given great importance to
the economic structure of a state because it helps shape up a country’s political
framework.
I believe that you have portrayed the relationship between the economic base and superstructure and the Marxist beliefs regarding it quite well.
ReplyDelete