The assembly is defined as a
representative body of the government that helps in passing legislation that
meets the needs of the public and
therefore is a reflection of its’ opinions. Although the democratic theory
implies that in principle assemblies should represent popular opinion, in
reality assemblies seldom work that way.
In particular, it can be argued that,
in Pakistan, the interests of certain political parties are the dominant factor
in the law making as the doctrine mandate asserts .The political party that is
dominant in these decisions is usually the party in power. It can be argued
then that the real power lies mainly in the hands of the executive faction as the
ruling party allies with the executive’s wishes.
For example, in Pakistan despite of the existence
of an opposition, the PML-N government and its Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has
significant power in the formulation of laws and policies. The executive
faction in the recent government is particularly strong, so much so that even
the current president Mamnoon Hussain has been merely reduced to a ‘puppet’
president with minimal influence in determining public policy.
Moreover, the assemblies tend to
be dominated by elitist politicians who are lobbying for their own interests
mainly to advance certain ideological and capitalist goals.
In conclusion, the assembly may
claim to be the’ voice of the people’ but is largely a tool for promoting
executive interests and cannot be called representative.
I agree with your point as our assemblies represents certain class and ideologies which are directly linked to their party affiliations and self interest. An example could be seen of Hudood Ordinance which was not only passed in Zia's regime but also remain enacted till 2006.
ReplyDelete