Locke’s ‘Second
Treatise of Government’ is one of the seminal yet controversial
works of political philosophy to date.
The central premise of Locke’s
arguments was based on freedom namely that of liberty and property.
Locke’s account of the ‘natural state’ of human nature or the
‘Lockean’ state is one of natural equality. From this stems
Locke’s theory of unilateral appropriation of property that formed
the basis of Rousseau’s ‘Social Contract’ and the counter to
which laid the foundations of modern labor economics and Marxism.
One
of the most significant aspects of Locke’s Theory of Property is
the contrast of human condition before and after the introduction of
money. Money plays a crucial role in Locke’s theory of property.
Locke argues that before its introduction, the equality of men was
mirrored in the equal rights to acquire property. Conflict was
limited by the fact that no one could acquire in excess to what their
labor yielded given the perishable nature of goods.
However, money in
the form of gold or silver provided an imperishable substitute that
soon transformed transactions. There was now an incentive to acquire
an excess of property because it could be exchanged for money that
was not perishable. This proliferated conflict over the now scarce
property that facilitated the need for a government to protect
property rights. So, it can be said that Locke laid down the foundations of the role of government related to property rights.
1 comment:
Zara I think you make good points about how Locke's conception of property rights influenced how states perceive of - and protect - property today.
Post a Comment